Skip to content

Index 1

DMCC Commodity Trade Index 2026

DMCC’s Commodity Trade Index Ranks the World’s Ten Most Significant Commodity Trade Hubs Against Three Pillars: Locational and Trading Partner Factors, Commodity Endowment, and Institutional Strength

United States, UAE, Netherlands, Switzerland, Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, United Kingdom, China, South Africa and Nigeria.

Now in its fifth edition, the Index draws on data from the World Bank, the United Nations, and other authoritative sources, enabling eight-year trend comparisons dating back to 2018

Read through the full 2026 Commodity Trade Index

The Commodity Trade Index encompasses three main pillars:

The Commodity Trade Index

For the first time, the 2026 Index uses nowcasting to reflect conditions as of April 2026, a necessity given the speed and scale of disruption

The Iran conflict, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and sweeping U.S. tariff retaliation have accelerated market shifts beyond what traditional lagged datasets can capture in real time. The 2026 Index draws on IMF high-frequency freight data and live WTO tariff information, current to April 2026; the directional findings are considered robust, though precise scores should be read with appropriate caution.

img-container-ship

The United States leads for the third consecutive year. The UAE retains second. The Netherlands makes a leap

Both the United States and the UAE recorded lower scores than in 2024, as tariff retaliation compressed the U.S. locational advantage and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz weighed on UAE petroleum exports. 

The Netherlands climbed from sixth to third, finishing level with the UAE on 47%. It accounts for a smaller share of commodity trade with the United States than almost any other hub in the index, and in a year of sweeping tariff retaliation, that insulation mattered.

Country Commodity endowment Locational & trading partner Institutional factors Index Score 2026 vs 2024
United States 67% 36% 67% 57% =
United Arab Emirates 61% 19% 61% 47% =
Netherlands 9% 69% 63% 47% +3
Switzerland 17% 42% 73% 44% -1
Hong Kong SAR, China 10% 35% 85% 43% =
Singapore 4% 43% 77% 41% −2
United Kingdom 17% 30% 61% 36% =
China 37% 0% 49% 29% =
South Africa 15% 6% 40% 21% =
Nigeria 43% 11% 0% 18% =

 

The 2026 results carry a clear message: diversification is protective. The hubs that are holding or gaining ground are those with broad commodity exposure, strong institutions, and trading relationships that do not concentrate risk in a single partner. Overexposure to a single trade partner has become a measurable liability.

Rank held | Rank gained | Rank Lost

China

29%
8th - held
China maintained eighth place but saw the sharpest score drop in the index, falling five percentage points to 29%. Its trade war with the US has driven its locational score to 0% — the only country to score zero in any pillar. Commodity endowment in rare earths and critical minerals remains a clear strength.

Hong Kong SAR, China

43%
5th — score rose vs 2024

Hong Kong SAR maintained its fifth place and saw its score rise, benefiting from a much smaller share of trade with the United States than most other hubs.

It leads all ten hubs in institutional factors with a score of 85%.

Netherlands

47%
3rd — up from 6th (+3)

The Netherlands climbed from sixth to third, the largest movement among hubs in the 2026 edition.

EU membership and a smaller share of commodities trade with the United States left it less exposed to tariff retaliation than most other hubs.

In a disrupted environment, relative resilience is its own competitive advantage.

Nigeria

18%
10th - held
Nigeria held last place with a score of 18% and is the only country to score 0% in the institutional pillar. Its oil reserves continue to drive significant petroleum exports, and high oil prices push its natural resource rents as a share of GDP to third among the ten hubs.

Singapore

41%
6th — down from 4th (−2)

Singapore fell two places to sixth, with a score of 41%, as its U.S. trade exposure makes it more vulnerable to tariff impositions than hubs with less concentrated U.S. trade.

Its institutional pillar remains the second strongest in the index, behind only Hong Kong SAR.

South Africa

21%
9th - held
South Africa retained ninth place with a score of 21%, continuing to lag on locational and trading partner factors. It has benefited from greater shipping passage through the Cape of Good Hope as Red Sea disruptions reroute global trade routes.

Switzerland

44%
4th - down from 3rd (-1)
Switzerland dropped one place to fourth with a score of 44%, driven primarily by tariff exposure. The US is estimated to be its largest export partner by a significant margin. Its institutional pillar remains strong, ranking third overall, anchored by trade facilitation and regulatory enforcement.

United Arab Emirates

47%
2nd — held

The UAE retained second place with a score of 47%, down three points from 2024, as the Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz weighed on petroleum exports.

Its corporate tax regime remains by far the most attractive of the ten hubs.

United Kingdom

36%
7th - held
The UK held seventh place with a score of 36%, with economic challenges weighing on its financial services performance and the value of commodities firms headquartered in London. It does a smaller proportion of its trade with the US compared to other hubs, offering some insulation from tariff volatility.

United States

57%
1st — held for the third consecutive edition

The United States holds first place for the third consecutive year with a score of 57%, though its overall score dropped two percentage points.

Its locational score fell from 54% to 36%, driven primarily by retaliatory tariffs imposed by major trading partners following Liberation Day in April 2025.

How did the Netherlands climb from sixth to third in the 2026 Commodity Trade Index?

Download Your Future of Trade 2026 Report

DMCC Logo Future of Trade Logo

Have questions? Want to chat more?
Reach out to our experts!

Contact Us

All rights reserved. Copyright DMCC ©2026