DMCC’s Commodity Trade Index Ranks the World’s Ten Most Significant Commodity Trade Hubs Against Three Pillars: Locational and Trading Partner Factors, Commodity Endowment, and Institutional Strength
United States, UAE, Netherlands, Switzerland, Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, United Kingdom, China, South Africa and Nigeria.
Now in its fifth edition, the Index draws on data from the World Bank, the United Nations, and other authoritative sources, enabling eight-year trend comparisons dating back to 2018
Read through the full 2026 Commodity Trade Index
The Commodity Trade Index encompasses three main pillars:
For the first time, the 2026 Index uses nowcasting to reflect conditions as of April 2026, a necessity given the speed and scale of disruption
The Iran conflict, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and sweeping U.S. tariff retaliation have accelerated market shifts beyond what traditional lagged datasets can capture in real time. The 2026 Index draws on IMF high-frequency freight data and live WTO tariff information, current to April 2026; the directional findings are considered robust, though precise scores should be read with appropriate caution.
The United States leads for the third consecutive year. The UAE retains second. The Netherlands makes a leap
Both the United States and the UAE recorded lower scores than in 2024, as tariff retaliation compressed the U.S. locational advantage and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz weighed on UAE petroleum exports.
The Netherlands climbed from sixth to third, finishing level with the UAE on 47%. It accounts for a smaller share of commodity trade with the United States than almost any other hub in the index, and in a year of sweeping tariff retaliation, that insulation mattered.
| Country | Commodity endowment | Locational & trading partner | Institutional factors | Index Score 2026 | vs 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 67% | 36% | 67% | 57% | = |
| United Arab Emirates | 61% | 19% | 61% | 47% | = |
| Netherlands | 9% | 69% | 63% | 47% | +3 |
| Switzerland | 17% | 42% | 73% | 44% | -1 |
| Hong Kong SAR, China | 10% | 35% | 85% | 43% | = |
| Singapore | 4% | 43% | 77% | 41% | −2 |
| United Kingdom | 17% | 30% | 61% | 36% | = |
| China | 37% | 0% | 49% | 29% | = |
| South Africa | 15% | 6% | 40% | 21% | = |
| Nigeria | 43% | 11% | 0% | 18% | = |
The 2026 results carry a clear message: diversification is protective. The hubs that are holding or gaining ground are those with broad commodity exposure, strong institutions, and trading relationships that do not concentrate risk in a single partner. Overexposure to a single trade partner has become a measurable liability.
Rank held | Rank gained | Rank Lost
China
8th - held
Hong Kong SAR, China
5th — score rose vs 2024
Hong Kong SAR maintained its fifth place and saw its score rise, benefiting from a much smaller share of trade with the United States than most other hubs.
It leads all ten hubs in institutional factors with a score of 85%.
Netherlands
3rd — up from 6th (+3)
The Netherlands climbed from sixth to third, the largest movement among hubs in the 2026 edition.
EU membership and a smaller share of commodities trade with the United States left it less exposed to tariff retaliation than most other hubs.
In a disrupted environment, relative resilience is its own competitive advantage.
Nigeria
10th - held
Singapore
6th — down from 4th (−2)
Singapore fell two places to sixth, with a score of 41%, as its U.S. trade exposure makes it more vulnerable to tariff impositions than hubs with less concentrated U.S. trade.
Its institutional pillar remains the second strongest in the index, behind only Hong Kong SAR.
South Africa
9th - held
Switzerland
4th - down from 3rd (-1)
United Arab Emirates
2nd — held
The UAE retained second place with a score of 47%, down three points from 2024, as the Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz weighed on petroleum exports.
Its corporate tax regime remains by far the most attractive of the ten hubs.
United Kingdom
7th - held
United States
1st — held for the third consecutive edition
The United States holds first place for the third consecutive year with a score of 57%, though its overall score dropped two percentage points.
Its locational score fell from 54% to 36%, driven primarily by retaliatory tariffs imposed by major trading partners following Liberation Day in April 2025.
China
8th - held
Hong Kong SAR, China
5th — score rose vs 2024
Hong Kong SAR maintained its fifth place and saw its score rise, benefiting from a much smaller share of trade with the United States than most other hubs.
It leads all ten hubs in institutional factors with a score of 85%.
Netherlands
3rd — up from 6th (+3)
The Netherlands climbed from sixth to third, the largest movement among hubs in the 2026 edition.
EU membership and a smaller share of commodities trade with the United States left it less exposed to tariff retaliation than most other hubs.
In a disrupted environment, relative resilience is its own competitive advantage.
Nigeria
10th - held
Singapore
6th — down from 4th (−2)
Singapore fell two places to sixth, with a score of 41%, as its U.S. trade exposure makes it more vulnerable to tariff impositions than hubs with less concentrated U.S. trade.
Its institutional pillar remains the second strongest in the index, behind only Hong Kong SAR.
South Africa
9th - held
Switzerland
4th - down from 3rd (-1)
United Arab Emirates
2nd — held
The UAE retained second place with a score of 47%, down three points from 2024, as the Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz weighed on petroleum exports.
Its corporate tax regime remains by far the most attractive of the ten hubs.
United Kingdom
7th - held
United States
1st — held for the third consecutive edition
The United States holds first place for the third consecutive year with a score of 57%, though its overall score dropped two percentage points.
Its locational score fell from 54% to 36%, driven primarily by retaliatory tariffs imposed by major trading partners following Liberation Day in April 2025.
Click on the map to preview more details